Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Sterling, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Sterling, CT.
| Data | Loves park | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,365 | 3,830 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $56,370 | $85,000 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 80.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Loves park vs Sterling
- In Loves park, the population is higher at 23,365, compared to 3,830 in Sterling.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Sterling has a higher median income of $85,000, compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- In Sterling, the percentage of married families is higher at 80.0%, compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Sterling.
- The unemployment rate in Loves park is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.9% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Loves park vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Loves park | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 2 |
| White | 71 | 95 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loves park at 7% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling at 95% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- The Asian population is larger in Loves park at 3% compared to 1% in Sterling.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Loves park at 10% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 0% in Sterling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and Sterling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Loves park | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 21.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Sterling
- More residents in Loves park report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Loves park at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Obesity rates are higher in Loves park at 39.4% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Disability percentages are higher in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Loves park | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (97) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (3,994) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (2,262) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (4,064) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- More residents in Loves park have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.