Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs State line, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs State line, MS.
Data | Loves park | State line |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,365 | 458 |
Median Age | 36.6 years | 34.0 years |
Median Income | $56,370 | $38,529 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 61.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Loves park vs State line
- In Loves park, the population is higher at 23,365, compared to 458 in State line.
- Residents in Loves park have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 34.0 years in State line.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370 compared to $38,529 in State line.
- In State line, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- The poverty level is higher in State line at 18%, compared to 9% in Loves park.
- State line has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Loves park vs State line provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Loves park | State line |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 97 |
White | 71 | 3 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs State line
- In State line, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 97% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 3% in State line.
- The Asian population is larger in Loves park at 3% compared to 0% in State line.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Loves park at 10% compared to 0% in State line.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 0% in State line.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and State line at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Loves park | State line |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 12.4% |
Depression | 21.3% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 13.5% |
Obesity | 39.4% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs State line
- In State line, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Loves park at 21.3% compared to 20.9% in State line.
- State line has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 13.5% in State line.
- State line has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in State line at 32.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Loves park | State line |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (97) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (3,994) | 55.9% (256) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (2,262) | 28.8% (132) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (4,064) | 4.1% (19) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs State line
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in State line.
- In State line, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 55.9% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in State line at 28.8%, compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 4.1% in State line.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.