Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs State line, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs State line, MS.

Data Loves park State line
Population 23,365 458
Median Age 36.6 years 34.0 years
Median Income $56,370 $38,529
Married Families 35.0% 61.0%
Poverty Level 9% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 5.5

Population Comparison: Loves park vs State line

  • In Loves park, the population is higher at 23,365, compared to 458 in State line.
  • Residents in Loves park have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 34.0 years in State line.
  • Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370 compared to $38,529 in State line.
  • In State line, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
  • The poverty level is higher in State line at 18%, compared to 9% in Loves park.
  • State line has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.

Demographics

Demographics Loves park vs State line provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Loves park State line
Black 7 97
White 71 3
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 10 Data is updating
Two or More Races 9 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs State line

  • In State line, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 97% compared to 7% in Loves park.
  • Loves park has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 3% in State line.
  • The Asian population is larger in Loves park at 3% compared to 0% in State line.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Loves park at 10% compared to 0% in State line.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 0% in State line.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and State line at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Loves park State line
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 12.4%
Depression 21.3% 20.9%
Smoking 17.0% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 13.5%
Obesity 39.4% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 32.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs State line

  • In State line, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Loves park at 21.3% compared to 20.9% in State line.
  • State line has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 13.5% in State line.
  • State line has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in State line at 32.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Loves park State line
No Schooling 0.4% (97) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.1% (3,994) 55.9% (256)
Less than High School 9.7% (2,262) 28.8% (132)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.4% (4,064) 4.1% (19)

Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs State line

  • A higher percentage of residents in Loves park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in State line.
  • In State line, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 55.9% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in State line at 28.8%, compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 4.1% in State line.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.