Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Stamford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Stamford, CT.
| Data | Loves park | Stamford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,365 | 136,188 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $56,370 | $100,718 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Loves park vs Stamford
- The population in Stamford is higher at 136,188, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- The median age in Stamford is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Stamford has a higher median income of $100,718, compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- In Stamford, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- The poverty level is identical in both Loves park and Stamford at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Loves park is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.6% in Stamford.
Demographics
Demographics Loves park vs Stamford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Loves park | Stamford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 19 |
| White | 71 | 33 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Stamford
- In Stamford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 33% in Stamford.
- In Stamford, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Loves park.
- Stamford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 10% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stamford at 11%, compared to 9% in Loves park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and Stamford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Loves park | Stamford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 13.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 17.1% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 11.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 25.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Stamford
- More residents in Loves park report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 13.4% in Stamford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Loves park at 21.3% compared to 17.1% in Stamford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 11.2% in Stamford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 16.1% in Stamford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Loves park at 39.4% compared to 25.1% in Stamford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Stamford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Loves park | Stamford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (97) | 1.6% (2,214) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (3,994) | 12.0% (16,291) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (2,262) | 15.0% (20,422) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (4,064) | 35.7% (48,639) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Stamford
- In Stamford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 12.0% in Stamford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stamford at 15.0%, compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- In Stamford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.