Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs South jordan, UT.
| Data | Loves park | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,365 | 83,513 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $56,370 | $119,822 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Loves park vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- Residents in Loves park have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Loves park vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Loves park | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | Data is updating |
| White | 71 | 83 |
| Asian | 3 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loves park at 7% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Loves park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Loves park at 10% compared to 7% in South jordan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Loves park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Loves park | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Loves park at 39.4% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Loves park | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (97) | 0.2% (172) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (3,994) | 8.4% (6,995) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (2,262) | 2.7% (2,236) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (4,064) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Loves park have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.