Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Mount union, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Mount union, PA.
| Data | Loves park | Mount union |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,365 | 2,267 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $56,370 | $38,382 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Loves park vs Mount union
- In Loves park, the population is higher at 23,365, compared to 2,267 in Mount union.
- Residents in Loves park have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 34.8 years in Mount union.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370 compared to $38,382 in Mount union.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Loves park at 35.0% compared to 25.0% in Mount union.
- The poverty level is higher in Mount union at 12%, compared to 9% in Loves park.
- Mount union has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Loves park vs Mount union provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Loves park | Mount union |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 8 |
| White | 71 | 87 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Mount union
- In Mount union, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount union at 87% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- The Asian population is larger in Loves park at 3% compared to 0% in Mount union.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Loves park at 10% compared to 1% in Mount union.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 4% in Mount union.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and Mount union at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Loves park | Mount union |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 20.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 26.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Mount union
- In Mount union, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount union at 25.6% versus 21.3% in Loves park.
- Mount union has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 16.4% in Mount union.
- Mount union has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mount union at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Loves park | Mount union |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (97) | 1.9% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (3,994) | 28.5% (646) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (2,262) | 16.3% (370) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (4,064) | 6.3% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Mount union
- In Mount union, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Mount union, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.5% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mount union at 16.3%, compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 6.3% in Mount union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.