Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Lawrence, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Lawrence, MA.
| Data | Loves park | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,365 | 87,954 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $56,370 | $53,977 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Loves park vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 87,954, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- Residents in Loves park have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 31.5 years in Lawrence.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370 compared to $53,977 in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Loves park at 35.0% compared to 26.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is higher in Lawrence at 15%, compared to 9% in Loves park.
- Lawrence has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Loves park vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Loves park | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 5 |
| White | 71 | -4 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 82 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loves park at 7% compared to 5% in Lawrence.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to -4% in Lawrence.
- The Asian population is larger in Loves park at 3% compared to 2% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 82%, compared to 10% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 15%, compared to 9% in Loves park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and Lawrence at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Loves park | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lawrence at 22.4% versus 21.3% in Loves park.
- Lawrence has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 14.5% in Lawrence.
- Obesity rates are higher in Loves park at 39.4% compared to 37.4% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Loves park and Lawrence at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Loves park | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (97) | 2.7% (2,366) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (3,994) | 18.6% (16,316) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (2,262) | 34.1% (29,963) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (4,064) | 9.2% (8,067) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Lawrence, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lawrence at 34.1%, compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 9.2% in Lawrence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.