Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Hope, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Hope, AR.
| Data | Loves park | Hope |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,365 | 8,624 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $56,370 | $43,018 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Loves park vs Hope
- In Loves park, the population is higher at 23,365, compared to 8,624 in Hope.
- Residents in Loves park have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 36.2 years in Hope.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370 compared to $43,018 in Hope.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Loves park at 35.0% compared to 29.0% in Hope.
- The poverty level is higher in Hope at 20%, compared to 9% in Loves park.
- Hope has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Loves park vs Hope provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Loves park | Hope |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 48 |
| White | 71 | 28 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Hope
- In Hope, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 48% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 28% in Hope.
- The Asian population is larger in Loves park at 3% compared to 0% in Hope.
- Hope has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 10% in Loves park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 4% in Hope.
- In Hope, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Loves park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Loves park | Hope |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 12.1% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 48.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Hope
- In Hope, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hope at 24.8% versus 21.3% in Loves park.
- Hope has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 12.1% in Hope.
- Hope has higher obesity rates at 48.0% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hope at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Loves park | Hope |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (97) | 3.0% (258) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (3,994) | 20.8% (1,790) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (2,262) | 19.0% (1,641) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (4,064) | 10.0% (863) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Hope
- In Hope, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Hope, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hope at 19.0%, compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 10.0% in Hope.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.