Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Henderson, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Henderson, NV.
Data | Loves park | Henderson |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,365 | 331,415 |
Median Age | 36.6 years | 42.3 years |
Median Income | $56,370 | $85,311 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Loves park vs Henderson
- The population in Henderson is higher at 331,415, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- The median age in Henderson is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Henderson has a higher median income of $85,311, compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- In Henderson, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Henderson.
- Henderson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Loves park vs Henderson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Loves park | Henderson |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 6 |
White | 71 | 56 |
Asian | 3 | 9 |
Hispanic | 10 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Henderson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loves park at 7% compared to 6% in Henderson.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 56% in Henderson.
- In Henderson, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 3% in Loves park.
- Henderson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 10% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Henderson at 10%, compared to 9% in Loves park.
- In Henderson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Loves park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Loves park | Henderson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 11.3% |
Depression | 21.3% | 19.5% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 14.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 39.4% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Henderson
- In Henderson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Loves park at 21.3% compared to 19.5% in Henderson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 14.7% in Henderson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 14.7% in Henderson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Loves park at 39.4% compared to 28.6% in Henderson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Henderson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Loves park | Henderson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (97) | 0.7% (2,336) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (3,994) | 14.1% (46,801) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (2,262) | 8.1% (26,764) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (4,064) | 24.6% (81,415) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Henderson
- In Henderson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 14.1% in Henderson.
- More residents in Loves park have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 8.1% in Henderson.
- In Henderson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.