Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Harrington park, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Harrington park, NJ.

Data Loves park Harrington park
Population 23,365 4,954
Median Age 36.6 years 46.9 years
Median Income $56,370 $183,138
Married Families 35.0% 57.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.4

Population Comparison: Loves park vs Harrington park

  • In Loves park, the population is higher at 23,365, compared to 4,954 in Harrington park.
  • The median age in Harrington park is higher at 46.9 years, compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
  • Harrington park has a higher median income of $183,138, compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
  • In Harrington park, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
  • Loves park has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • The unemployment rate in Loves park is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.4% in Harrington park.

Demographics

Demographics Loves park vs Harrington park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Loves park Harrington park
Black 7 Data is updating
White 71 70
Asian 3 19
Hispanic 10 5
Two or More Races 9 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Harrington park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loves park at 7% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • Loves park has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 70% in Harrington park.
  • In Harrington park, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 3% in Loves park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Loves park at 10% compared to 5% in Harrington park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 6% in Harrington park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and Harrington park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Loves park Harrington park
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 7.0%
Depression 21.3% 16.7%
Smoking 17.0% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 17.5%
Obesity 39.4% 23.0%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Harrington park

  • More residents in Loves park report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 12.5% in Harrington park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Loves park at 21.3% compared to 16.7% in Harrington park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 9.6% in Harrington park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Harrington park at 17.5% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Loves park at 39.4% compared to 23.0% in Harrington park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Harrington park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Loves park Harrington park
No Schooling 0.4% (97) 0.2% (10)
High School Diploma 17.1% (3,994) 7.0% (345)
Less than High School 9.7% (2,262) 2.1% (105)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.4% (4,064) 47.3% (2,342)

Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Harrington park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Loves park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Harrington park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 7.0% in Harrington park.
  • More residents in Loves park have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 2.1% in Harrington park.
  • In Harrington park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.3% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.