Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Grand junction, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Grand junction, CO.

Data Loves park Grand junction
Population 23,365 68,034
Median Age 36.6 years 39.9 years
Median Income $56,370 $62,993
Married Families 35.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 9% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 4.7

Population Comparison: Loves park vs Grand junction

  • The population in Grand junction is higher at 68,034, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
  • The median age in Grand junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
  • Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993, compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Loves park and Grand junction at 35.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Grand junction at 10%, compared to 9% in Loves park.
  • Grand junction has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.

Demographics

Demographics Loves park vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Loves park Grand junction
Black 7 1
White 71 73
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 10 16
Two or More Races 9 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Grand junction

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loves park at 7% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand junction at 73% compared to 71% in Loves park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Loves park at 3% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 10% in Loves park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 8% in Grand junction.
  • In Grand junction, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Loves park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Loves park Grand junction
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 11.8%
Depression 21.3% 24.5%
Smoking 17.0% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 19.2%
Obesity 39.4% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Grand junction

  • In Grand junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Grand junction at 24.5% versus 21.3% in Loves park.
  • Grand junction has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Loves park at 39.4% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Loves park Grand junction
No Schooling 0.4% (97) 0.4% (245)
High School Diploma 17.1% (3,994) 13.9% (9,476)
Less than High School 9.7% (2,262) 9.7% (6,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.4% (4,064) 23.8% (16,201)

Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Grand junction

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Loves park and Grand junction at 0.4%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 9.7%.
  • In Grand junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.