Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Cedar falls, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Cedar falls, IA.

Data Loves park Cedar falls
Population 23,365 40,746
Median Age 36.6 years 28.0 years
Median Income $56,370 $71,011
Married Families 35.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 9% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 2.9

Population Comparison: Loves park vs Cedar falls

  • The population in Cedar falls is higher at 40,746, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
  • Residents in Loves park have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
  • Cedar falls has a higher median income of $71,011, compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
  • In Cedar falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
  • Loves park has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Cedar falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Loves park is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.

Demographics

Demographics Loves park vs Cedar falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Loves park Cedar falls
Black 7 1
White 71 90
Asian 3 4
Hispanic 10 3
Two or More Races 9 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Cedar falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loves park at 7% compared to 1% in Cedar falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar falls at 90% compared to 71% in Loves park.
  • In Cedar falls, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Loves park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Loves park at 10% compared to 3% in Cedar falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and Cedar falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Loves park Cedar falls
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 9.0%
Depression 21.3% 19.8%
Smoking 17.0% 14.9%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 22.2%
Obesity 39.4% 34.8%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Cedar falls

  • More residents in Loves park report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Loves park at 21.3% compared to 19.8% in Cedar falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 14.9% in Cedar falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Loves park at 39.4% compared to 34.8% in Cedar falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Loves park Cedar falls
No Schooling 0.4% (97) 0.1% (43)
High School Diploma 17.1% (3,994) 9.6% (3,893)
Less than High School 9.7% (2,262) 2.8% (1,147)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.4% (4,064) 26.8% (10,913)

Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Cedar falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Loves park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Cedar falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 9.6% in Cedar falls.
  • More residents in Loves park have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 2.8% in Cedar falls.
  • In Cedar falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.