Demographics details for Loves park, IL vs Arcadia, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loves park, IL vs Arcadia, CA.
Data | Loves park | Arcadia |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,365 | 54,857 |
Median Age | 36.6 years | 44.1 years |
Median Income | $56,370 | $108,214 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Loves park vs Arcadia
- The population in Arcadia is higher at 54,857, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- The median age in Arcadia is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Arcadia has a higher median income of $108,214, compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- In Arcadia, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- The poverty level is identical in both Loves park and Arcadia at 9%.
- Arcadia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Loves park vs Arcadia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Loves park | Arcadia |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 2 |
White | 71 | 14 |
Asian | 3 | 59 |
Hispanic | 10 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Loves park vs Arcadia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loves park at 7% compared to 2% in Arcadia.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 14% in Arcadia.
- In Arcadia, the Asian population stands at 59%, greater than 3% in Loves park.
- Arcadia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 10% in Loves park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Loves park at 9% compared to 8% in Arcadia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loves park and Arcadia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Loves park | Arcadia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 11.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 7.4% |
Depression | 21.3% | 11.6% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 12.4% |
Obesity | 39.4% | 18.1% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loves park vs Arcadia
- More residents in Loves park report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 11.5% in Arcadia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Loves park at 21.3% compared to 11.6% in Arcadia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 7.3% in Arcadia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 12.4% in Arcadia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Loves park at 39.4% compared to 18.1% in Arcadia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Arcadia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Loves park | Arcadia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (97) | 1.7% (927) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (3,994) | 11.8% (6,449) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (2,262) | 7.4% (4,055) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (4,064) | 40.5% (22,194) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loves park vs Arcadia
- In Arcadia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loves park hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 11.8% in Arcadia.
- More residents in Loves park have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 7.4% in Arcadia.
- In Arcadia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.5% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.