Demographics details for Lovejoy, GA vs Sioux falls, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lovejoy, GA vs Sioux falls, SD.
Data | Lovejoy | Sioux falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,638 | 202,078 |
Median Age | 26.5 years | 34.9 years |
Median Income | $59,184 | $71,785 |
Married Families | 13.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Lovejoy vs Sioux falls
- The population in Sioux falls is higher at 202,078, compared to 11,638 in Lovejoy.
- The median age in Sioux falls is higher at 34.9 years, compared to 26.5 years in Lovejoy.
- Sioux falls has a higher median income of $71,785, compared to $59,184 in Lovejoy.
- In Sioux falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 13.0% in Lovejoy.
- Lovejoy has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Sioux falls.
- The unemployment rate in Lovejoy is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.0% in Sioux falls.
Demographics
Demographics Lovejoy vs Sioux falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lovejoy | Sioux falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 70 | 7 |
White | 15 | 78 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 10 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Lovejoy vs Sioux falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lovejoy at 70% compared to 7% in Sioux falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sioux falls at 78% compared to 15% in Lovejoy.
- In Sioux falls, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Lovejoy.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lovejoy at 10% compared to 5% in Sioux falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sioux falls at 6%, compared to 5% in Lovejoy.
- In Sioux falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Lovejoy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lovejoy | Sioux falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 13.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 8.8% |
Depression | 16.4% | 19.4% |
Smoking | 18.8% | 16.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 21.6% |
Obesity | 43.8% | 35.8% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lovejoy vs Sioux falls
- More residents in Lovejoy report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.3% in Sioux falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sioux falls at 19.4% versus 16.4% in Lovejoy.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lovejoy at 18.8% compared to 16.0% in Sioux falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sioux falls at 21.6% compared to 14.0% in Lovejoy.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lovejoy at 43.8% compared to 35.8% in Sioux falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sioux falls at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Lovejoy.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lovejoy | Sioux falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (39) | 0.8% (1,619) |
High School Diploma | 7.5% (872) | 13.1% (26,548) |
Less than High School | 6.4% (748) | 7.3% (14,743) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (1,420) | 23.3% (47,034) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lovejoy vs Sioux falls
- In Sioux falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Lovejoy.
- In Sioux falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 7.5% in Lovejoy.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sioux falls at 7.3%, compared to 6.4% in Lovejoy.
- In Sioux falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 12.2% in Lovejoy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.