Demographics details for Louisburg, NC vs Vancleave, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Louisburg, NC vs Vancleave, MS.
Data | Louisburg | Vancleave |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,215 | 5,207 |
Median Age | 28.9 years | 37.7 years |
Median Income | $41,813 | $72,576 |
Married Families | 17.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Louisburg vs Vancleave
- The population in Vancleave is higher at 5,207, compared to 3,215 in Louisburg.
- The median age in Vancleave is higher at 37.7 years, compared to 28.9 years in Louisburg.
- Vancleave has a higher median income of $72,576, compared to $41,813 in Louisburg.
- In Vancleave, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 17.0% in Louisburg.
- The poverty level is identical in both Louisburg and Vancleave at 13%.
- The unemployment rate in Louisburg is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Vancleave.
Demographics
Demographics Louisburg vs Vancleave provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Louisburg | Vancleave |
---|---|---|
Black | 53 | 5 |
White | 39 | 92 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Louisburg vs Vancleave
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Louisburg at 53% compared to 5% in Vancleave.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Vancleave at 92% compared to 39% in Louisburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Louisburg at 2% compared to 0% in Vancleave.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Louisburg at 3% compared to 1% in Vancleave.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Louisburg at 3% compared to 2% in Vancleave.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Louisburg and Vancleave at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Louisburg | Vancleave |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 10.9% |
Depression | 22.3% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 39.0% | 33.0% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Louisburg vs Vancleave
- More residents in Louisburg report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.2% in Vancleave.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Vancleave at 23.7% versus 22.3% in Louisburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Louisburg at 19.5% compared to 17.6% in Vancleave.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Vancleave at 17.1% compared to 15.8% in Louisburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Louisburg at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Vancleave.
- Disability percentages are higher in Louisburg at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Vancleave.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Louisburg | Vancleave |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (3) | 1.3% (67) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (458) | 14.7% (765) |
Less than High School | 11.0% (353) | 8.5% (445) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (300) | 17.0% (884) |
Education Levels Comparison: Louisburg vs Vancleave
- In Vancleave, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.1% in Louisburg.
- In Vancleave, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 14.2% in Louisburg.
- More residents in Louisburg have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 8.5% in Vancleave.
- In Vancleave, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 9.3% in Louisburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.