Environment details: Lost hills CA
Moderate concerns due to nearby agricultural practices.
Environment details: Kingston TN
acceptable; some quality issues remain.
Compare Environment: Lost hills CA vs Kingston TN
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Lost hills | Kingston |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 2592 | 741 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Moderate concerns due to nearby agricultural practices. | acceptable; some quality issues remain. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.98 | 1.6 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 84 | 30 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Lost hills vs Kingston
- The water quality in Kingston is superior at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Lost hills.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Lost hills with 1.98 compared to 1.6 in Kingston.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Lost hills at 84 compared to 30 in Kingston.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.