Environment details: Lost hills CA
Moderate concerns due to nearby agricultural practices.
Environment details: Irma WI
Water quality very poor; high contamination levels.
Compare Environment: Lost hills CA vs Irma WI
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Lost hills | Irma |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 2592 | 740 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 2/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Moderate concerns due to nearby agricultural practices. | Water quality very poor; high contamination levels. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.98 | 1.62 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 84 | 16 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Lost hills vs Irma
- Water quality is rated higher in Lost hills at 4/10 compared to 2/10 in Irma.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Lost hills with 1.98 compared to 1.62 in Irma.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Lost hills at 84 compared to 16 in Irma.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.