Demographics details for Lost hills, CA vs Dearborn, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lost hills, CA vs Dearborn, MI.
| Data | Lost hills | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,754 | 107,710 |
| Median Age | 23.8 years | 32.3 years |
| Median Income | $41,250 | $64,600 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Lost hills vs Dearborn
- The population in Dearborn is higher at 107,710, compared to 1,754 in Lost hills.
- The median age in Dearborn is higher at 32.3 years, compared to 23.8 years in Lost hills.
- Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600, compared to $41,250 in Lost hills.
- In Dearborn, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Lost hills.
- Lost hills has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 12% in Dearborn.
- The unemployment rate in Lost hills is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.
Demographics
Demographics Lost hills vs Dearborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lost hills | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | -35 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 97 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 37 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lost hills vs Dearborn
- In Dearborn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Lost hills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dearborn at 86% compared to -35% in Lost hills.
- In Dearborn, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Lost hills.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lost hills at 97% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lost hills at 37% compared to 5% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lost hills and Dearborn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lost hills | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 19.8% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 20.9% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lost hills vs Dearborn
- More residents in Lost hills report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 19.4% in Dearborn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dearborn at 26.6% versus 18.9% in Lost hills.
- Dearborn has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 20.9% in Lost hills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 13.6% in Lost hills.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lost hills at 43.3% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Dearborn at 11.0% compared to 4.0% in Lost hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lost hills | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.7% (65) | 2.8% (3,058) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (175) | 12.3% (13,249) |
| Less than High School | 64.7% (1,134) | 17.5% (18,849) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.9% (16) | 21.3% (22,938) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lost hills vs Dearborn
- A higher percentage of residents in Lost hills have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 2.8% in Dearborn.
- In Dearborn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 10.0% in Lost hills.
- More residents in Lost hills have less than a high school education at 64.7% compared to 17.5% in Dearborn.
- In Dearborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 0.9% in Lost hills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.