Demographics details for Los angeles, CA vs Fancy farm, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Los angeles, CA vs Fancy farm, KY.

Data Los angeles Fancy farm
Population 3,822,238 300
Median Age 36.5 years 51.1 years
Median Income $76,244 $55,060
Married Families 33.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 17% 10%
Unemployment Rate 6.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Los angeles vs Fancy farm

  • In Los angeles, the population is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 300 in Fancy farm.
  • The median age in Fancy farm is higher at 51.1 years, compared to 36.5 years in Los angeles.
  • Los angeles has a higher median income of $76,244 compared to $55,060 in Fancy farm.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Los angeles at 33.0% compared to 31.0% in Fancy farm.
  • Los angeles has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in Fancy farm.
  • The unemployment rate in Los angeles is higher at 6.0%, compared to 3.2% in Fancy farm.

Demographics

Demographics Los angeles vs Fancy farm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Los angeles Fancy farm
Black 9 3
White 16 91
Asian 12 Data is updating
Hispanic 49 Data is updating
Two or More Races 13 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Los angeles vs Fancy farm

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Los angeles at 9% compared to 3% in Fancy farm.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fancy farm at 91% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
  • The Asian population is larger in Los angeles at 12% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Los angeles at 49% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Los angeles at 13% compared to 6% in Fancy farm.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Los angeles at 1% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Los angeles Fancy farm
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 12.6%
Depression 16.1% 27.3%
Smoking 11.8% 20.6%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 16.7%
Obesity 29.5% 37.4%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Los angeles vs Fancy farm

  • In Fancy farm, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.8% in Los angeles.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fancy farm at 27.3% versus 16.1% in Los angeles.
  • Fancy farm has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 11.8% in Los angeles.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fancy farm at 16.7% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
  • Fancy farm has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 29.5% in Los angeles.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fancy farm at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Los angeles.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Los angeles Fancy farm
No Schooling 3.0% (116,335) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 12.1% (461,986) 47.7% (143)
Less than High School 28.8% (1,101,987) 5.3% (16)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.2% (1,002,780) 14.3% (43)

Education Levels Comparison: Los angeles vs Fancy farm

  • A higher percentage of residents in Los angeles have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Fancy farm.
  • In Fancy farm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 47.7% compared to 12.1% in Los angeles.
  • More residents in Los angeles have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 5.3% in Fancy farm.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Los angeles hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 14.3% in Fancy farm.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.