Demographics details for Los angeles, CA vs Clarion, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Los angeles, CA vs Clarion, IA.
Data | Los angeles | Clarion |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,822,238 | 2,749 |
Median Age | 36.5 years | 47.4 years |
Median Income | $76,244 | $48,853 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Los angeles vs Clarion
- In Los angeles, the population is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 2,749 in Clarion.
- The median age in Clarion is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 36.5 years in Los angeles.
- Los angeles has a higher median income of $76,244 compared to $48,853 in Clarion.
- In Clarion, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 33.0% in Los angeles.
- Los angeles has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 10% in Clarion.
- The unemployment rate in Los angeles is higher at 6.0%, compared to 2.5% in Clarion.
Demographics
Demographics Los angeles vs Clarion provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Los angeles | Clarion |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | Data is updating |
White | 16 | 76 |
Asian | 12 | 1 |
Hispanic | 49 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Los angeles vs Clarion
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Los angeles at 9% compared to 0% in Clarion.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarion at 76% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
- The Asian population is larger in Los angeles at 12% compared to 1% in Clarion.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Los angeles at 49% compared to 16% in Clarion.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Los angeles at 13% compared to 7% in Clarion.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Los angeles at 1% compared to 0% in Clarion.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Los angeles | Clarion |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.1% |
Depression | 16.1% | 18.9% |
Smoking | 11.8% | 19.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 19.8% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Los angeles vs Clarion
- In Clarion, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.8% in Los angeles.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarion at 18.9% versus 16.1% in Los angeles.
- Clarion has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 11.8% in Los angeles.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clarion at 19.8% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
- Clarion has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 29.5% in Los angeles.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarion at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Los angeles.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Los angeles | Clarion |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.0% (116,335) | 1.0% (27) |
High School Diploma | 12.1% (461,986) | 21.9% (602) |
Less than High School | 28.8% (1,101,987) | 12.9% (355) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.2% (1,002,780) | 15.9% (438) |
Education Levels Comparison: Los angeles vs Clarion
- A higher percentage of residents in Los angeles have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.0% in Clarion.
- In Clarion, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 12.1% in Los angeles.
- More residents in Los angeles have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 12.9% in Clarion.
- A higher percentage of residents in Los angeles hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 15.9% in Clarion.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.