Demographics details for Los angeles, CA vs Chicago, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Los angeles, CA vs Chicago, IL.
Data | Los angeles | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,822,238 | 2,665,039 |
Median Age | 36.5 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $76,244 | $71,673 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Los angeles vs Chicago
- In Los angeles, the population is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 2,665,039 in Chicago.
- Residents in Los angeles have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Los angeles has a higher median income of $76,244 compared to $71,673 in Chicago.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Los angeles at 33.0% compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- The poverty level is higher in Chicago at 18%, compared to 17% in Los angeles.
- Chicago has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 6.0% in Los angeles.
Demographics
Demographics Los angeles vs Chicago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Los angeles | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 29 |
White | 16 | 23 |
Asian | 12 | 7 |
Hispanic | 49 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Los angeles vs Chicago
- In Chicago, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 9% in Los angeles.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chicago at 23% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
- The Asian population is larger in Los angeles at 12% compared to 7% in Chicago.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Los angeles at 49% compared to 30% in Chicago.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Los angeles at 13% compared to 10% in Chicago.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Los angeles and Chicago at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Los angeles | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.6% |
Depression | 16.1% | 16.3% |
Smoking | 11.8% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Los angeles vs Chicago
- More residents in Los angeles report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chicago at 16.3% versus 16.1% in Los angeles.
- Chicago has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 11.8% in Los angeles.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chicago at 16.5% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
- Chicago has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 29.5% in Los angeles.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chicago at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Los angeles.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Los angeles | Chicago |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.0% (116,335) | 1.7% (44,697) |
High School Diploma | 12.1% (461,986) | 13.3% (354,780) |
Less than High School | 28.8% (1,101,987) | 15.8% (419,784) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.2% (1,002,780) | 30.4% (811,024) |
Education Levels Comparison: Los angeles vs Chicago
- A higher percentage of residents in Los angeles have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.7% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 12.1% in Los angeles.
- More residents in Los angeles have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 15.8% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 26.2% in Los angeles.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.