Demographics details for Los angeles, CA vs Carrboro, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Los angeles, CA vs Carrboro, NC.
| Data | Los angeles | Carrboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,822,238 | 21,298 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $76,244 | $76,933 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Los angeles vs Carrboro
- In Los angeles, the population is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 21,298 in Carrboro.
- Residents in Los angeles have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 33.1 years in Carrboro.
- Carrboro has a higher median income of $76,933, compared to $76,244 in Los angeles.
- In Carrboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Los angeles.
- Los angeles has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 12% in Carrboro.
- The unemployment rate in Los angeles is higher at 6.0%, compared to 3.5% in Carrboro.
Demographics
Demographics Los angeles vs Carrboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Los angeles | Carrboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 14 |
| White | 16 | 61 |
| Asian | 12 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 49 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Los angeles vs Carrboro
- In Carrboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 9% in Los angeles.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carrboro at 61% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
- The Asian population is larger in Los angeles at 12% compared to 9% in Carrboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Los angeles at 49% compared to 8% in Carrboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Los angeles at 13% compared to 7% in Carrboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Los angeles and Carrboro at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Los angeles | Carrboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 13.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 16.1% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 10.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 29.5% | 27.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Los angeles vs Carrboro
- More residents in Los angeles report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.0% in Carrboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carrboro at 20.5% versus 16.1% in Los angeles.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Los angeles at 11.8% compared to 10.3% in Carrboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carrboro at 17.5% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
- Obesity rates are higher in Los angeles at 29.5% compared to 27.4% in Carrboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Los angeles at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Carrboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Los angeles | Carrboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (116,335) | 1.3% (273) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (461,986) | 4.1% (868) |
| Less than High School | 28.8% (1,101,987) | 4.6% (984) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.2% (1,002,780) | 46.7% (9,945) |
Education Levels Comparison: Los angeles vs Carrboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Los angeles have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.3% in Carrboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Los angeles hold a high school diploma at 12.1% compared to 4.1% in Carrboro.
- More residents in Los angeles have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 4.6% in Carrboro.
- In Carrboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.7% compared to 26.2% in Los angeles.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.