Demographics details for Longville, LA vs Mcpherson, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Longville, LA vs Mcpherson, KS.
| Data | Longville | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 319 | 13,865 |
| Median Age | 68.6 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $37,650 | $69,807 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Longville vs Mcpherson
- The population in Mcpherson is higher at 13,865, compared to 319 in Longville.
- Residents in Longville have a higher median age of 68.6 years compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807, compared to $37,650 in Longville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Longville at 51.0% compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
- Longville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- The unemployment rate in Longville is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Longville vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Longville | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 90 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Longville vs Mcpherson
- In Mcpherson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Longville.
- Longville has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 87% in Mcpherson.
- In Mcpherson, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Longville.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Longville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Longville at 10% compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Longville and Mcpherson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Longville | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 78.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Longville vs Mcpherson
- More residents in Longville report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Longville at 29.8% compared to 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Longville at 22.9% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Longville at 20.0% compared to 18.2% in Mcpherson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Longville at 39.0% compared to 36.6% in Mcpherson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Longville at 78.0% compared to 14.0% in Mcpherson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Longville | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (49) | 12.8% (1,775) |
| Less than High School | 36.7% (117) | 5.8% (804) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (54) | 21.7% (3,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Longville vs Mcpherson
- In Mcpherson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Longville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Longville hold a high school diploma at 15.4% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- More residents in Longville have less than a high school education at 36.7% compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- In Mcpherson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 16.9% in Longville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.