Demographics details for Longville, LA vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Longville, LA vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Longville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 319 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 68.6 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $37,650 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Longville vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 319 in Longville.
- Residents in Longville have a higher median age of 68.6 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $37,650 in Longville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Longville at 51.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- Longville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- The unemployment rate in Longville is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Longville vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Longville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 15 |
| White | 90 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Longville vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Longville.
- Longville has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Longville.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Longville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Longville at 10% compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Longville and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Longville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 78.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Longville vs Gallatin
- More residents in Longville report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 19.0% in Gallatin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Longville at 29.8% compared to 27.7% in Gallatin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Longville at 22.9% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Longville at 20.0% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Longville at 39.0% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Longville at 78.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Longville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (49) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 36.7% (117) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (54) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Longville vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Longville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Longville hold a high school diploma at 15.4% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- More residents in Longville have less than a high school education at 36.7% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 16.9% in Longville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.