Demographics details for Longview, WA vs Taylorsville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Longview, WA vs Taylorsville, UT.
Data | Longview | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,782 | 57,879 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $57,920 | $81,417 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Longview vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 37,782 in Longview.
- Residents in Longview have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417, compared to $57,920 in Longview.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 33.0% in Longview.
- Longview has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The unemployment rate in Longview is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Longview vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Longview | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 76 | 57 |
Asian | 2 | 7 |
Hispanic | 10 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Longview vs Taylorsville
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Longview and Taylorsville at 1%.
- Longview has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Longview.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 10% in Longview.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Longview at 10% compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Longview and Taylorsville at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Longview | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 11.4% |
Depression | 29.4% | 27.2% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 10.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 38.7% | 32.0% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Longview vs Taylorsville
- More residents in Longview report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.8% in Taylorsville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Longview at 29.4% compared to 27.2% in Taylorsville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Longview at 20.1% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Longview at 16.0% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Longview at 38.7% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Longview at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Longview | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (494) | 1.2% (721) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (6,511) | 16.9% (9,799) |
Less than High School | 15.1% (5,701) | 15.2% (8,775) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (4,167) | 15.7% (9,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Longview vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of residents in Longview have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Longview hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 15.2%, compared to 15.1% in Longview.
- In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 11.0% in Longview.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.