Demographics details for Longview, WA vs Fairview heights, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Longview, WA vs Fairview heights, IL.

Data Longview Fairview heights
Population 37,782 16,324
Median Age 39.9 years 40.0 years
Median Income $57,920 $74,038
Married Families 33.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Longview vs Fairview heights

  • In Longview, the population is higher at 37,782, compared to 16,324 in Fairview heights.
  • The median age in Fairview heights is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 39.9 years in Longview.
  • Fairview heights has a higher median income of $74,038, compared to $57,920 in Longview.
  • In Fairview heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 33.0% in Longview.
  • Longview has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Fairview heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Longview is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Fairview heights.

Demographics

Demographics Longview vs Fairview heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Longview Fairview heights
Black 1 30
White 76 54
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 10 3
Two or More Races 10 12
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Longview vs Fairview heights

  • In Fairview heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 1% in Longview.
  • Longview has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 54% in Fairview heights.
  • The Asian population is larger in Longview at 2% compared to 1% in Fairview heights.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Longview at 10% compared to 3% in Fairview heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairview heights at 12%, compared to 10% in Longview.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Longview at 1% compared to 0% in Fairview heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Longview Fairview heights
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 14.4% 10.5%
Depression 29.4% 19.0%
Smoking 20.1% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 16.8%
Obesity 38.7% 42.1%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Longview vs Fairview heights

  • More residents in Longview report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 15.3% in Fairview heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Longview at 29.4% compared to 19.0% in Fairview heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Longview at 20.1% compared to 15.5% in Fairview heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairview heights at 16.8% compared to 16.0% in Longview.
  • Fairview heights has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 38.7% in Longview.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Longview at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Fairview heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Longview Fairview heights
No Schooling 1.3% (494) 1.0% (168)
High School Diploma 17.2% (6,511) 14.5% (2,359)
Less than High School 15.1% (5,701) 7.3% (1,187)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.0% (4,167) 22.0% (3,596)

Education Levels Comparison: Longview vs Fairview heights

  • A higher percentage of residents in Longview have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.0% in Fairview heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Longview hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 14.5% in Fairview heights.
  • More residents in Longview have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 7.3% in Fairview heights.
  • In Fairview heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Longview.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.