Demographics details for London, KY vs Fairfield, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in London, KY vs Fairfield, AL.
| Data | London | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,578 | 9,690 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 30.7 years |
| Median Income | $45,858 | $45,646 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: London vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 9,690, compared to 7,578 in London.
- Residents in London have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- London has a higher median income of $45,858 compared to $45,646 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in London at 35.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 30%, compared to 13% in London.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.8% in London.
Demographics
Demographics London vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | London | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 95 |
| White | 93 | 3 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: London vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 95% compared to 2% in London.
- London has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 3% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in London at 1% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in London at 2% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- Both London and Fairfield have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both London and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | London | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 29.0% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 11.7% |
| Obesity | 46.7% | 48.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: London vs Fairfield
- More residents in London report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 19.7% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in London at 29.0% compared to 19.6% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in London at 24.5% compared to 20.6% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in London at 14.8% compared to 11.7% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 48.1% compared to 46.7% in London.
- Disability percentages are higher in London at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | London | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (93) | 0.5% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 19.7% (1,496) | 22.3% (2,159) |
| Less than High School | 18.6% (1,409) | 3.1% (302) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (900) | 14.8% (1,437) |
Education Levels Comparison: London vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in London have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 19.7% in London.
- More residents in London have less than a high school education at 18.6% compared to 3.1% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 11.9% in London.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.