Demographics details for Loganville, GA vs Southfield, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loganville, GA vs Southfield, MI.
Data | Loganville | Southfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,239 | 75,431 |
Median Age | 36.1 years | 42.1 years |
Median Income | $77,750 | $63,980 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Loganville vs Southfield
- The population in Southfield is higher at 75,431, compared to 15,239 in Loganville.
- The median age in Southfield is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 36.1 years in Loganville.
- Loganville has a higher median income of $77,750 compared to $63,980 in Southfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Loganville at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Southfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Southfield at 13%, compared to 7% in Loganville.
- Southfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.6% in Loganville.
Demographics
Demographics Loganville vs Southfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Loganville | Southfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | 66 |
White | 46 | 23 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Loganville vs Southfield
- In Southfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 34% in Loganville.
- Loganville has a higher percentage of White residents at 46% compared to 23% in Southfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Loganville at 3% compared to 2% in Southfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Loganville at 12% compared to 2% in Southfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Southfield at 7%, compared to 5% in Loganville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loganville and Southfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Loganville | Southfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.9% |
Depression | 21.8% | 17.6% |
Smoking | 15.7% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 38.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loganville vs Southfield
- More residents in Loganville report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.4% in Southfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Loganville at 21.8% compared to 17.6% in Southfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Loganville at 15.7% compared to 14.8% in Southfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Loganville at 16.1% compared to 14.9% in Southfield.
- Southfield has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 34.4% in Loganville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Southfield at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Loganville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Loganville | Southfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (46) | 1.2% (870) |
High School Diploma | 12.9% (1,965) | 12.0% (9,038) |
Less than High School | 9.4% (1,428) | 6.1% (4,623) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (2,568) | 27.5% (20,760) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loganville vs Southfield
- In Southfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Loganville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loganville hold a high school diploma at 12.9% compared to 12.0% in Southfield.
- More residents in Loganville have less than a high school education at 9.4% compared to 6.1% in Southfield.
- In Southfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.5% compared to 16.9% in Loganville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.