Demographics details for Loganville, GA vs Mc graw, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loganville, GA vs Mc graw, NY.
| Data | Loganville | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,239 | 994 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $77,750 | $60,781 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Loganville vs Mc graw
- In Loganville, the population is higher at 15,239, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- Residents in Loganville have a higher median age of 36.1 years compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Loganville has a higher median income of $77,750 compared to $60,781 in Mc graw.
- In Mc graw, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Loganville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Loganville and Mc graw at 7%.
- The unemployment rate in Loganville is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Mc graw.
Demographics
Demographics Loganville vs Mc graw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Loganville | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | Data is updating |
| White | 46 | 88 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Loganville vs Mc graw
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loganville at 34% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mc graw at 88% compared to 46% in Loganville.
- The Asian population is larger in Loganville at 3% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Loganville at 12% compared to 4% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mc graw at 8%, compared to 5% in Loganville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loganville and Mc graw at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Loganville | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loganville vs Mc graw
- More residents in Loganville report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.2% in Mc graw.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mc graw at 25.5% versus 21.8% in Loganville.
- Mc graw has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 15.7% in Loganville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mc graw at 19.1% compared to 16.1% in Loganville.
- Mc graw has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 34.4% in Loganville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mc graw at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Loganville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Loganville | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (46) | 0.3% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (1,965) | 27.1% (269) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (1,428) | 15.1% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (2,568) | 8.8% (87) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loganville vs Mc graw
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Loganville and Mc graw at 0.3%.
- In Mc graw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 12.9% in Loganville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mc graw at 15.1%, compared to 9.4% in Loganville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Loganville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 8.8% in Mc graw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.