Demographics details for Loganville, GA vs Cudahy, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Loganville, GA vs Cudahy, WI.
Data | Loganville | Cudahy |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,239 | 17,796 |
Median Age | 36.1 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $77,750 | $66,592 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Loganville vs Cudahy
- The population in Cudahy is higher at 17,796, compared to 15,239 in Loganville.
- The median age in Cudahy is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 36.1 years in Loganville.
- Loganville has a higher median income of $77,750 compared to $66,592 in Cudahy.
- In Cudahy, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Loganville.
- The poverty level is higher in Cudahy at 11%, compared to 7% in Loganville.
- The unemployment rate in Loganville is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Cudahy.
Demographics
Demographics Loganville vs Cudahy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Loganville | Cudahy |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | 3 |
White | 46 | 77 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 12 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Loganville vs Cudahy
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Loganville at 34% compared to 3% in Cudahy.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cudahy at 77% compared to 46% in Loganville.
- The Asian population is larger in Loganville at 3% compared to 2% in Cudahy.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Loganville at 12% compared to 9% in Cudahy.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cudahy at 9%, compared to 5% in Loganville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Loganville and Cudahy at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Loganville | Cudahy |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.6% |
Depression | 21.8% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 15.7% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 26.4% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 34.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Loganville vs Cudahy
- More residents in Loganville report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.5% in Cudahy.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cudahy at 24.3% versus 21.8% in Loganville.
- Cudahy has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 15.7% in Loganville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 16.1% in Loganville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Loganville at 34.4% compared to 34.2% in Cudahy.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cudahy at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Loganville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Loganville | Cudahy |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (46) | 0.9% (166) |
High School Diploma | 12.9% (1,965) | 25.1% (4,460) |
Less than High School | 9.4% (1,428) | 9.9% (1,768) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (2,568) | 21.0% (3,730) |
Education Levels Comparison: Loganville vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Loganville.
- In Cudahy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 12.9% in Loganville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cudahy at 9.9%, compared to 9.4% in Loganville.
- In Cudahy, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 16.9% in Loganville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.