Demographics details for Logan, UT vs Southaven, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Logan, UT vs Southaven, MS.
Data | Logan | Southaven |
---|---|---|
Population | 54,680 | 56,360 |
Median Age | 23.7 years | 35.4 years |
Median Income | $52,473 | $72,513 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Logan vs Southaven
- The population in Southaven is higher at 56,360, compared to 54,680 in Logan.
- The median age in Southaven is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 23.7 years in Logan.
- Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513, compared to $52,473 in Logan.
- In Southaven, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 36.0% in Logan.
- Logan has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Southaven.
- The unemployment rate in Logan is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.2% in Southaven.
Demographics
Demographics Logan vs Southaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Logan | Southaven |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 35 |
White | 73 | 55 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 14 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Logan vs Southaven
- In Southaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 2% in Logan.
- Logan has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 55% in Southaven.
- The Asian population is larger in Logan at 4% compared to 1% in Southaven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Logan at 14% compared to 5% in Southaven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Logan at 7% compared to 4% in Southaven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Logan and Southaven at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Logan | Southaven |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 10.9% |
Depression | 25.7% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 11.8% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 9.8% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Logan vs Southaven
- More residents in Logan report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
- Depression is more prevalent in Logan at 25.7% compared to 22.9% in Southaven.
- Southaven has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 11.8% in Logan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Southaven at 14.1% compared to 9.8% in Logan.
- Southaven has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 35.0% in Logan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Southaven at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Logan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Logan | Southaven |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (488) | 1.2% (658) |
High School Diploma | 7.5% (4,106) | 15.8% (8,925) |
Less than High School | 6.4% (3,491) | 8.7% (4,879) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (9,087) | 16.0% (9,035) |
Education Levels Comparison: Logan vs Southaven
- In Southaven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Logan.
- In Southaven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 7.5% in Logan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Southaven at 8.7%, compared to 6.4% in Logan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Logan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 16.0% in Southaven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.