Demographics details for Logan, UT vs Cranberry township, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Logan, UT vs Cranberry township, PA.
Data | Logan | Cranberry township |
---|---|---|
Population | 54,680 | 31,560 |
Median Age | 23.7 years | 41.0 years |
Median Income | $52,473 | $100,000 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 72.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Logan vs Cranberry township
- In Logan, the population is higher at 54,680, compared to 31,560 in Cranberry township.
- The median age in Cranberry township is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 23.7 years in Logan.
- Cranberry township has a higher median income of $100,000, compared to $52,473 in Logan.
- In Cranberry township, the percentage of married families is higher at 72.0%, compared to 36.0% in Logan.
- Logan has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 4% in Cranberry township.
- The unemployment rate in Logan is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.2% in Cranberry township.
Demographics
Demographics Logan vs Cranberry township provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Logan | Cranberry township |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 3 |
White | 73 | 90 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 14 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Logan vs Cranberry township
- In Cranberry township, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Logan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cranberry township at 90% compared to 73% in Logan.
- Both Logan and Cranberry township have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Logan at 14% compared to 2% in Cranberry township.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Logan at 7% compared to 1% in Cranberry township.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Logan and Cranberry township at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Logan | Cranberry township |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.7% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 11.8% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 9.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 35.0% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Logan vs Cranberry township
- More residents in Logan report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
- Depression is more prevalent in Logan at 25.7% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Logan at 11.8% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
- Binge drinking is more common in Logan at 9.8% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
- Obesity rates are higher in Logan at 35.0% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
- Disability percentages are higher in Logan at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Logan | Cranberry township |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (488) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 7.5% (4,106) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 6.4% (3,491) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (9,087) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Logan vs Cranberry township
- A higher percentage of residents in Logan have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
- A higher percentage of residents in Logan hold a high school diploma at 7.5% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
- More residents in Logan have less than a high school education at 6.4% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
- A higher percentage of residents in Logan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.