Demographics details for Logan, OH vs Santa fe springs, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Logan, OH vs Santa fe springs, CA.

Data Logan Santa fe springs
Population 46,040 18,439
Median Age 41.8 years 38.0 years
Median Income $69,125 $81,500
Married Families 47.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 9% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 5.5

Population Comparison: Logan vs Santa fe springs

  • In Logan, the population is higher at 46,040, compared to 18,439 in Santa fe springs.
  • Residents in Logan have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 38.0 years in Santa fe springs.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500, compared to $69,125 in Logan.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Logan at 47.0% compared to 37.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Santa fe springs at 10%, compared to 9% in Logan.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 4.8% in Logan.

Demographics

Demographics Logan vs Santa fe springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Logan Santa fe springs
Black 2 4
White 91 -5
Asian 1 8
Hispanic 2 75
Two or More Races 4 15
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Logan vs Santa fe springs

  • In Santa fe springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Logan.
  • Logan has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
  • In Santa fe springs, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Logan.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 2% in Logan.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Santa fe springs at 15%, compared to 4% in Logan.
  • In Santa fe springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Logan.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Logan Santa fe springs
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 11.7%
Depression 24.6% 15.1%
Smoking 21.1% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 15.7%
Obesity 39.9% 30.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Logan vs Santa fe springs

  • More residents in Logan report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Logan at 24.6% compared to 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Logan at 21.1% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Logan at 18.5% compared to 15.7% in Santa fe springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Logan at 39.9% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Logan at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Logan Santa fe springs
No Schooling 0.4% (204) 3.5% (644)
High School Diploma 27.1% (12,459) 16.3% (3,011)
Less than High School 9.5% (4,365) 26.5% (4,883)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.1% (6,040) 15.5% (2,850)

Education Levels Comparison: Logan vs Santa fe springs

  • In Santa fe springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.4% in Logan.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Logan hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 16.3% in Santa fe springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santa fe springs at 26.5%, compared to 9.5% in Logan.
  • In Santa fe springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 13.1% in Logan.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.