Demographics details for Locust grove, OK vs Fort mill, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Locust grove, OK vs Fort mill, SC.
Data | Locust grove | Fort mill |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,387 | 30,940 |
Median Age | 36.6 years | 36.7 years |
Median Income | $41,313 | $128,125 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Locust grove vs Fort mill
- The population in Fort mill is higher at 30,940, compared to 1,387 in Locust grove.
- The median age in Fort mill is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 36.6 years in Locust grove.
- Fort mill has a higher median income of $128,125, compared to $41,313 in Locust grove.
- In Fort mill, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 34.0% in Locust grove.
- Locust grove has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.2% in Locust grove.
Demographics
Demographics Locust grove vs Fort mill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Locust grove | Fort mill |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 9 |
White | 30 | 79 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 4 |
American Indian | 50 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Locust grove vs Fort mill
- In Fort mill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Locust grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort mill at 79% compared to 30% in Locust grove.
- In Fort mill, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Locust grove.
- Fort mill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Locust grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Locust grove at 14% compared to 4% in Fort mill.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Locust grove at 50% compared to 0% in Fort mill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Locust grove | Fort mill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.9% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.5% | 9.4% |
Depression | 27.1% | 21.1% |
Smoking | 27.8% | 12.3% |
Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 44.6% | 31.6% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Locust grove vs Fort mill
- More residents in Locust grove report poor mental health at 21.9% compared to 15.4% in Fort mill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Locust grove at 27.1% compared to 21.1% in Fort mill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Locust grove at 27.8% compared to 12.3% in Fort mill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort mill at 18.3% compared to 13.4% in Locust grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Locust grove at 44.6% compared to 31.6% in Fort mill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Locust grove at 24.0% compared to 5.0% in Fort mill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Locust grove | Fort mill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (4) | 0.3% (78) |
High School Diploma | 20.5% (285) | 7.7% (2,372) |
Less than High School | 13.1% (182) | 2.8% (879) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (98) | 30.0% (9,271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Locust grove vs Fort mill
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Locust grove and Fort mill at 0.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Locust grove hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 7.7% in Fort mill.
- More residents in Locust grove have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 2.8% in Fort mill.
- In Fort mill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.0% compared to 7.1% in Locust grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.