Demographics details for Locust grove, GA vs Keizer, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Locust grove, GA vs Keizer, OR.
Data | Locust grove | Keizer |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,734 | 38,704 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $67,143 | $75,753 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Locust grove vs Keizer
- The population in Keizer is higher at 38,704, compared to 10,734 in Locust grove.
- The median age in Keizer is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 33.1 years in Locust grove.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753, compared to $67,143 in Locust grove.
- In Keizer, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 26.0% in Locust grove.
- The poverty level is higher in Keizer at 10%, compared to 6% in Locust grove.
- The unemployment rate in Locust grove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Keizer.
Demographics
Demographics Locust grove vs Keizer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Locust grove | Keizer |
---|---|---|
Black | 37 | 1 |
White | 50 | 58 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Locust grove vs Keizer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Locust grove at 37% compared to 1% in Keizer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keizer at 58% compared to 50% in Locust grove.
- Both Locust grove and Keizer have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Keizer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 8% in Locust grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keizer at 14%, compared to 4% in Locust grove.
- In Keizer, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Locust grove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Locust grove | Keizer |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 11.4% |
Depression | 21.0% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 16.6% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 37.3% | 35.7% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Locust grove vs Keizer
- In Keizer, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.6% in Locust grove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keizer at 28.5% versus 21.0% in Locust grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Locust grove at 16.6% compared to 15.4% in Keizer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Keizer at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Locust grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Locust grove at 37.3% compared to 35.7% in Keizer.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keizer at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Locust grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Locust grove | Keizer |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (30) | 1.8% (685) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,824) | 12.7% (4,898) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (663) | 13.9% (5,363) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (1,367) | 17.1% (6,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Locust grove vs Keizer
- In Keizer, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.3% in Locust grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Locust grove hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 12.7% in Keizer.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keizer at 13.9%, compared to 6.2% in Locust grove.
- In Keizer, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 12.7% in Locust grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.