Demographics details for Locust grove, GA vs Clayton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Locust grove, GA vs Clayton, OH.
| Data | Locust grove | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,734 | 13,235 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $67,143 | $89,282 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Locust grove vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 13,235, compared to 10,734 in Locust grove.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 33.1 years in Locust grove.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282, compared to $67,143 in Locust grove.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 26.0% in Locust grove.
- The poverty level is higher in Clayton at 10%, compared to 6% in Locust grove.
- The unemployment rate in Locust grove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Locust grove vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Locust grove | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 37 | 30 |
| White | 50 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Locust grove vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Locust grove at 37% compared to 30% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 61% compared to 50% in Locust grove.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Locust grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Locust grove at 8% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 4% in Locust grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Locust grove and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Locust grove | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Locust grove vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.6% in Locust grove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 24.4% versus 21.0% in Locust grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Locust grove at 16.6% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 16.4% in Locust grove.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 37.3% in Locust grove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Locust grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Locust grove | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (30) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,824) | 17.9% (2,371) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (663) | 5.6% (746) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (1,367) | 26.3% (3,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Locust grove vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Locust grove have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Locust grove.
- More residents in Locust grove have less than a high school education at 6.2% compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 12.7% in Locust grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.