Demographics details for Livingston, TX vs Lumber bridge, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Livingston, TX vs Lumber bridge, NC.
Data | Livingston | Lumber bridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,784 | 82 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 43.8 years |
Median Income | $47,952 | $61,250 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Livingston vs Lumber bridge
- In Livingston, the population is higher at 5,784, compared to 82 in Lumber bridge.
- The median age in Lumber bridge is higher at 43.8 years, compared to 36.9 years in Livingston.
- Lumber bridge has a higher median income of $61,250, compared to $47,952 in Livingston.
- In Lumber bridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 28.0% in Livingston.
- The poverty level is identical in both Livingston and Lumber bridge at 12%.
- Lumber bridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Livingston.
Demographics
Demographics Livingston vs Lumber bridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Livingston | Lumber bridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | 7 |
White | 38 | 88 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 29 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Livingston vs Lumber bridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Livingston at 18% compared to 7% in Lumber bridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lumber bridge at 88% compared to 38% in Livingston.
- The Asian population is larger in Livingston at 2% compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Livingston at 29% compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Livingston at 13% compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
- In Lumber bridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Livingston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Livingston | Lumber bridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 14.2% |
Depression | 24.1% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 23.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 42.1% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Livingston vs Lumber bridge
- More residents in Livingston report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.8% in Lumber bridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Livingston at 24.1% compared to 23.8% in Lumber bridge.
- Lumber bridge has a higher smoking rate at 23.0% compared to 19.9% in Livingston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Livingston at 17.9% compared to 16.2% in Lumber bridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Livingston at 42.1% compared to 40.5% in Lumber bridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Livingston at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Lumber bridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Livingston | Lumber bridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (123) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 20.7% (1,198) | 32.9% (27) |
Less than High School | 22.3% (1,289) | 9.8% (8) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (518) | 7.3% (6) |
Education Levels Comparison: Livingston vs Lumber bridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Livingston have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Lumber bridge.
- In Lumber bridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.9% compared to 20.7% in Livingston.
- More residents in Livingston have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 9.8% in Lumber bridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Livingston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.0% compared to 7.3% in Lumber bridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.