Demographics details for Livingston, TX vs Griffin, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Livingston, TX vs Griffin, IN.
| Data | Livingston | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,784 | 142 |
| Median Age | 36.9 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $47,952 | $61,250 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Livingston vs Griffin
- In Livingston, the population is higher at 5,784, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- Residents in Livingston have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher median income of $61,250, compared to $47,952 in Livingston.
- In Griffin, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 28.0% in Livingston.
- Livingston has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Griffin.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Livingston and Griffin at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Livingston vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Livingston | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | Data is updating |
| White | 38 | 98 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Livingston vs Griffin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Livingston at 18% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Griffin at 98% compared to 38% in Livingston.
- The Asian population is larger in Livingston at 2% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Livingston at 29% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Livingston at 13% compared to 2% in Griffin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Livingston and Griffin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Livingston | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 42.1% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Livingston vs Griffin
- More residents in Livingston report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.2% in Griffin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Griffin at 26.3% versus 24.1% in Livingston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Livingston at 19.9% compared to 18.5% in Griffin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Livingston at 17.9% compared to 17.4% in Griffin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Livingston at 42.1% compared to 37.8% in Griffin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Livingston at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Livingston | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (123) | 1.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (1,198) | 16.9% (24) |
| Less than High School | 22.3% (1,289) | 9.9% (14) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (518) | 12.0% (17) |
Education Levels Comparison: Livingston vs Griffin
- A higher percentage of residents in Livingston have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.4% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Livingston hold a high school diploma at 20.7% compared to 16.9% in Griffin.
- More residents in Livingston have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 9.9% in Griffin.
- In Griffin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Livingston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.