Demographics details for Livingston, AL vs San marcos, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Livingston, AL vs San marcos, CA.
Data | Livingston | San marcos |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,205 | 94,854 |
Median Age | 21.2 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $20,417 | $99,413 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 27% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Livingston vs San marcos
- The population in San marcos is higher at 94,854, compared to 3,205 in Livingston.
- The median age in San marcos is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 21.2 years in Livingston.
- San marcos has a higher median income of $99,413, compared to $20,417 in Livingston.
- In San marcos, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 19.0% in Livingston.
- Livingston has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 9% in San marcos.
- San marcos has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.2% in Livingston.
Demographics
Demographics Livingston vs San marcos provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Livingston | San marcos |
---|---|---|
Black | 58 | 2 |
White | 38 | 31 |
Asian | 1 | 10 |
Hispanic | 1 | 40 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Livingston vs San marcos
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Livingston at 58% compared to 2% in San marcos.
- Livingston has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 31% in San marcos.
- In San marcos, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 1% in Livingston.
- San marcos has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 1% in Livingston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San marcos at 16%, compared to 2% in Livingston.
- In San marcos, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Livingston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Livingston | San marcos |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 10.8% |
Depression | 22.0% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 11.2% |
Binge Drinking | 12.3% | 18.6% |
Obesity | 46.2% | 24.2% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Livingston vs San marcos
- More residents in Livingston report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 15.9% in San marcos.
- Depression is more prevalent in Livingston at 22.0% compared to 17.8% in San marcos.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Livingston at 21.5% compared to 11.2% in San marcos.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San marcos at 18.6% compared to 12.3% in Livingston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Livingston at 46.2% compared to 24.2% in San marcos.
- Disability percentages are higher in Livingston at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in San marcos.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Livingston | San marcos |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (1,684) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (248) | 10.1% (9,567) |
Less than High School | 2.3% (74) | 15.0% (14,213) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (496) | 26.4% (25,049) |
Education Levels Comparison: Livingston vs San marcos
- In San marcos, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Livingston.
- In San marcos, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.1% compared to 7.7% in Livingston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San marcos at 15.0%, compared to 2.3% in Livingston.
- In San marcos, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 15.5% in Livingston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.