Demographics details for Livingston, AL vs Crandall, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Livingston, AL vs Crandall, TX.
Data | Livingston | Crandall |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,205 | 4,641 |
Median Age | 21.2 years | 37.3 years |
Median Income | $20,417 | $101,829 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 27% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Livingston vs Crandall
- The population in Crandall is higher at 4,641, compared to 3,205 in Livingston.
- The median age in Crandall is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 21.2 years in Livingston.
- Crandall has a higher median income of $101,829, compared to $20,417 in Livingston.
- In Crandall, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 19.0% in Livingston.
- Livingston has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 5% in Crandall.
- The unemployment rate in Livingston is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Crandall.
Demographics
Demographics Livingston vs Crandall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Livingston | Crandall |
---|---|---|
Black | 58 | 3 |
White | 38 | 75 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Livingston vs Crandall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Livingston at 58% compared to 3% in Crandall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crandall at 75% compared to 38% in Livingston.
- The Asian population is larger in Livingston at 1% compared to 0% in Crandall.
- Crandall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 1% in Livingston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crandall at 3%, compared to 2% in Livingston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Livingston and Crandall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Livingston | Crandall |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 11.3% |
Depression | 22.0% | 25.2% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 12.3% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 46.2% | 34.3% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Livingston vs Crandall
- More residents in Livingston report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.6% in Crandall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crandall at 25.2% versus 22.0% in Livingston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Livingston at 21.5% compared to 17.6% in Crandall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crandall at 19.7% compared to 12.3% in Livingston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Livingston at 46.2% compared to 34.3% in Crandall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Livingston at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in Crandall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Livingston | Crandall |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (37) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (248) | 13.4% (622) |
Less than High School | 2.3% (74) | 9.0% (420) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (496) | 12.8% (594) |
Education Levels Comparison: Livingston vs Crandall
- In Crandall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Livingston.
- In Crandall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.4% compared to 7.7% in Livingston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crandall at 9.0%, compared to 2.3% in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Livingston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 12.8% in Crandall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.