Demographics details for Livingston, AL vs Carrboro, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Livingston, AL vs Carrboro, NC.
Data | Livingston | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,205 | 21,298 |
Median Age | 21.2 years | 33.1 years |
Median Income | $20,417 | $76,933 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 27% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Livingston vs Carrboro
- The population in Carrboro is higher at 21,298, compared to 3,205 in Livingston.
- The median age in Carrboro is higher at 33.1 years, compared to 21.2 years in Livingston.
- Carrboro has a higher median income of $76,933, compared to $20,417 in Livingston.
- In Carrboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 19.0% in Livingston.
- Livingston has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 12% in Carrboro.
- The unemployment rate in Livingston is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Carrboro.
Demographics
Demographics Livingston vs Carrboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Livingston | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 58 | 14 |
White | 38 | 61 |
Asian | 1 | 9 |
Hispanic | 1 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Livingston vs Carrboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Livingston at 58% compared to 14% in Carrboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carrboro at 61% compared to 38% in Livingston.
- In Carrboro, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Livingston.
- Carrboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 1% in Livingston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carrboro at 7%, compared to 2% in Livingston.
- In Carrboro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Livingston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Livingston | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 13.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 8.2% |
Depression | 22.0% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 10.3% |
Binge Drinking | 12.3% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 46.2% | 27.4% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Livingston vs Carrboro
- More residents in Livingston report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 13.0% in Carrboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Livingston at 22.0% compared to 20.5% in Carrboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Livingston at 21.5% compared to 10.3% in Carrboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carrboro at 17.5% compared to 12.3% in Livingston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Livingston at 46.2% compared to 27.4% in Carrboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Livingston at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Carrboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Livingston | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (273) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (248) | 4.1% (868) |
Less than High School | 2.3% (74) | 4.6% (984) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (496) | 46.7% (9,945) |
Education Levels Comparison: Livingston vs Carrboro
- In Carrboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Livingston hold a high school diploma at 7.7% compared to 4.1% in Carrboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carrboro at 4.6%, compared to 2.3% in Livingston.
- In Carrboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.7% compared to 15.5% in Livingston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.