Demographics details for Livingston, AL vs Carmel, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Livingston, AL vs Carmel, IN.
Data | Livingston | Carmel |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,205 | 101,964 |
Median Age | 21.2 years | 40.6 years |
Median Income | $20,417 | $132,859 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 27% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Livingston vs Carmel
- The population in Carmel is higher at 101,964, compared to 3,205 in Livingston.
- The median age in Carmel is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 21.2 years in Livingston.
- Carmel has a higher median income of $132,859, compared to $20,417 in Livingston.
- In Carmel, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 19.0% in Livingston.
- Livingston has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 4% in Carmel.
- The unemployment rate in Livingston is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Carmel.
Demographics
Demographics Livingston vs Carmel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Livingston | Carmel |
---|---|---|
Black | 58 | 3 |
White | 38 | 77 |
Asian | 1 | 11 |
Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Livingston vs Carmel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Livingston at 58% compared to 3% in Carmel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carmel at 77% compared to 38% in Livingston.
- In Carmel, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Livingston.
- Carmel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Livingston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carmel at 5%, compared to 2% in Livingston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Livingston and Carmel at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Livingston | Carmel |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 12.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 6.9% |
Depression | 22.0% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 9.0% |
Binge Drinking | 12.3% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 46.2% | 27.0% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Livingston vs Carmel
- More residents in Livingston report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 12.2% in Carmel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Livingston at 22.0% compared to 21.8% in Carmel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Livingston at 21.5% compared to 9.0% in Carmel.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carmel at 16.7% compared to 12.3% in Livingston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Livingston at 46.2% compared to 27.0% in Carmel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Livingston at 17.0% compared to 6.0% in Carmel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Livingston | Carmel |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (323) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (248) | 4.8% (4,920) |
Less than High School | 2.3% (74) | 2.3% (2,394) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (496) | 48.5% (49,477) |
Education Levels Comparison: Livingston vs Carmel
- In Carmel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Livingston hold a high school diploma at 7.7% compared to 4.8% in Carmel.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 2.3%.
- In Carmel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 48.5% compared to 15.5% in Livingston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.