Demographics details for Livermore, CA vs Worcester, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Livermore, CA vs Worcester, MA.
Data | Livermore | Worcester |
---|---|---|
Population | 84,701 | 205,319 |
Median Age | 40.3 years | 34.3 years |
Median Income | $152,590 | $63,011 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Livermore vs Worcester
- The population in Worcester is higher at 205,319, compared to 84,701 in Livermore.
- Residents in Livermore have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 34.3 years in Worcester.
- Livermore has a higher median income of $152,590 compared to $63,011 in Worcester.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Livermore at 48.0% compared to 29.0% in Worcester.
- The poverty level is higher in Worcester at 12%, compared to 5% in Livermore.
- Worcester has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.9% in Livermore.
Demographics
Demographics Livermore vs Worcester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Livermore | Worcester |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 13 |
White | 44 | 44 |
Asian | 17 | 7 |
Hispanic | 23 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Livermore vs Worcester
- In Worcester, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 2% in Livermore.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Livermore and Worcester at 44%.
- The Asian population is larger in Livermore at 17% compared to 7% in Worcester.
- Worcester has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 23% in Livermore.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Livermore at 13% compared to 12% in Worcester.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Livermore at 1% compared to 0% in Worcester.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Livermore | Worcester |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 11.8% |
Depression | 19.6% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 9.4% | 17.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 15.5% |
Obesity | 26.6% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Livermore vs Worcester
- In Worcester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.9% in Livermore.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Worcester at 23.1% versus 19.6% in Livermore.
- Worcester has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 9.4% in Livermore.
- Binge drinking is more common in Livermore at 18.4% compared to 15.5% in Worcester.
- Worcester has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 26.6% in Livermore.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Worcester at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Livermore.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Livermore | Worcester |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (1,173) | 1.7% (3,577) |
High School Diploma | 9.5% (8,051) | 15.6% (31,987) |
Less than High School | 7.8% (6,576) | 16.0% (32,925) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (30,013) | 21.5% (44,155) |
Education Levels Comparison: Livermore vs Worcester
- In Worcester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.4% in Livermore.
- In Worcester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 9.5% in Livermore.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Worcester at 16.0%, compared to 7.8% in Livermore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Livermore hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 21.5% in Worcester.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.