Demographics details for Live oak, FL vs Zanesville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Live oak, FL vs Zanesville, OH.
| Data | Live oak | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,034 | 24,600 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $43,664 | $40,927 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Live oak vs Zanesville
- The population in Zanesville is higher at 24,600, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- The median age in Zanesville is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 37.5 years in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher median income of $43,664 compared to $40,927 in Zanesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Live oak at 31.0% compared to 25.0% in Zanesville.
- Live oak has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 11% in Zanesville.
- Zanesville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 4.2% in Live oak.
Demographics
Demographics Live oak vs Zanesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Live oak | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 9 |
| White | 41 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Live oak vs Zanesville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Live oak at 38% compared to 9% in Zanesville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Zanesville at 79% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- In Zanesville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Live oak.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Live oak at 9% compared to 3% in Zanesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Live oak at 12% compared to 8% in Zanesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Live oak and Zanesville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Live oak | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 25.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 47.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Live oak vs Zanesville
- In Zanesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Zanesville at 26.7% versus 19.3% in Live oak.
- Zanesville has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 22.3% in Live oak.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Zanesville at 16.6% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Zanesville has higher obesity rates at 47.8% compared to 37.1% in Live oak.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Zanesville at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Live oak | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (147) | 1.6% (389) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (1,755) | 26.5% (6,510) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (796) | 17.8% (4,373) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (545) | 9.0% (2,214) |
Education Levels Comparison: Live oak vs Zanesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Live oak have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.6% in Zanesville.
- In Zanesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.5% compared to 25.0% in Live oak.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Zanesville at 17.8%, compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- In Zanesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.0% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.