Demographics details for Live oak, FL vs Shelbyville, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Live oak, FL vs Shelbyville, TN.
| Data | Live oak | Shelbyville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,034 | 24,452 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $43,664 | $50,694 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Live oak vs Shelbyville
- The population in Shelbyville is higher at 24,452, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- Residents in Live oak have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 31.3 years in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher median income of $50,694, compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Live oak at 31.0% compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
- Live oak has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Shelbyville.
- The unemployment rate in Live oak is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.1% in Shelbyville.
Demographics
Demographics Live oak vs Shelbyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Live oak | Shelbyville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 11 |
| White | 41 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Live oak vs Shelbyville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Live oak at 38% compared to 11% in Shelbyville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelbyville at 51% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- Both Live oak and Shelbyville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Shelbyville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 9% in Live oak.
- Both Live oak and Shelbyville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 12%.
- In Shelbyville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Live oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Live oak | Shelbyville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 27.5% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Live oak vs Shelbyville
- In Shelbyville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbyville at 27.5% versus 19.3% in Live oak.
- Shelbyville has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 22.3% in Live oak.
- Binge drinking is more common in Live oak at 14.9% compared to 14.3% in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 37.1% in Live oak.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelbyville at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Live oak | Shelbyville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (147) | 0.8% (185) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (1,755) | 21.6% (5,273) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (796) | 20.7% (5,051) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (545) | 7.7% (1,889) |
Education Levels Comparison: Live oak vs Shelbyville
- A higher percentage of residents in Live oak have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Shelbyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Live oak hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 21.6% in Shelbyville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelbyville at 20.7%, compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Live oak and Shelbyville at 7.7%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.