Demographics details for Live oak, FL vs Norway, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Live oak, FL vs Norway, IA.
| Data | Live oak | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,034 | 466 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 48.3 years |
| Median Income | $43,664 | $90,000 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Live oak vs Norway
- In Live oak, the population is higher at 7,034, compared to 466 in Norway.
- The median age in Norway is higher at 48.3 years, compared to 37.5 years in Live oak.
- Norway has a higher median income of $90,000, compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- In Norway, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The unemployment rate in Live oak is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Norway.
Demographics
Demographics Live oak vs Norway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Live oak | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 41 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Live oak vs Norway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Live oak at 38% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norway at 100% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- Both Live oak and Norway have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Live oak at 9% compared to 0% in Norway.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Live oak at 12% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Live oak and Norway at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Live oak | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 22.9% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Live oak vs Norway
- More residents in Live oak report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.2% in Norway.
- Depression is more prevalent in Live oak at 19.3% compared to 17.5% in Norway.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Live oak at 22.3% compared to 14.7% in Norway.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norway at 22.9% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Obesity rates are higher in Live oak at 37.1% compared to 36.8% in Norway.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norway at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Live oak | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (147) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (1,755) | 33.5% (156) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (796) | 5.6% (26) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (545) | 10.5% (49) |
Education Levels Comparison: Live oak vs Norway
- A higher percentage of residents in Live oak have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- In Norway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.5% compared to 25.0% in Live oak.
- More residents in Live oak have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 5.6% in Norway.
- In Norway, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.