Demographics details for Live oak, FL vs Mosheim, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Live oak, FL vs Mosheim, TN.
| Data | Live oak | Mosheim |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,034 | 2,508 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 47.8 years |
| Median Income | $43,664 | $45,294 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Live oak vs Mosheim
- In Live oak, the population is higher at 7,034, compared to 2,508 in Mosheim.
- The median age in Mosheim is higher at 47.8 years, compared to 37.5 years in Live oak.
- Mosheim has a higher median income of $45,294, compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- In Mosheim, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 12% in Mosheim.
- Mosheim has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.2% in Live oak.
Demographics
Demographics Live oak vs Mosheim provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Live oak | Mosheim |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 41 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Live oak vs Mosheim
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Live oak at 38% compared to 0% in Mosheim.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mosheim at 97% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- Both Live oak and Mosheim have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Live oak at 9% compared to 1% in Mosheim.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Live oak at 12% compared to 2% in Mosheim.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Live oak and Mosheim at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Live oak | Mosheim |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 20.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 29.7% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 25.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 36.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 39.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Live oak vs Mosheim
- In Mosheim, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mosheim at 29.7% versus 19.3% in Live oak.
- Mosheim has a higher smoking rate at 25.1% compared to 22.3% in Live oak.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mosheim at 15.7% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Obesity rates are higher in Live oak at 37.1% compared to 36.9% in Mosheim.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mosheim at 39.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Live oak | Mosheim |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (147) | 0.2% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (1,755) | 32.3% (811) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (796) | 33.3% (836) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (545) | 7.1% (179) |
Education Levels Comparison: Live oak vs Mosheim
- A higher percentage of residents in Live oak have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.2% in Mosheim.
- In Mosheim, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.3% compared to 25.0% in Live oak.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mosheim at 33.3%, compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Live oak hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.7% compared to 7.1% in Mosheim.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.