Demographics details for Live oak, FL vs Jackson, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Live oak, FL vs Jackson, MI.
| Data | Live oak | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,034 | 31,031 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $43,664 | $41,988 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 7.9 |
Population Comparison: Live oak vs Jackson
- The population in Jackson is higher at 31,031, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- Residents in Live oak have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Live oak has a higher median income of $43,664 compared to $41,988 in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Live oak at 31.0% compared to 27.0% in Jackson.
- The poverty level is higher in Jackson at 21%, compared to 16% in Live oak.
- Jackson has a higher unemployment rate at 7.9% compared to 4.2% in Live oak.
Demographics
Demographics Live oak vs Jackson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Live oak | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 21 |
| White | 41 | 62 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Live oak vs Jackson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Live oak at 38% compared to 21% in Jackson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jackson at 62% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- In Jackson, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Live oak.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Live oak at 9% compared to 6% in Jackson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Live oak at 12% compared to 10% in Jackson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Live oak and Jackson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Live oak | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 26.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Live oak vs Jackson
- In Jackson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jackson at 27.0% versus 19.3% in Live oak.
- Jackson has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 22.3% in Live oak.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Live oak and Jackson at 14.9%.
- Jackson has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 37.1% in Live oak.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jackson at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Live oak | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (147) | 0.5% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (1,755) | 21.1% (6,548) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (796) | 14.2% (4,397) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (545) | 10.1% (3,126) |
Education Levels Comparison: Live oak vs Jackson
- A higher percentage of residents in Live oak have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.5% in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Live oak hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 21.1% in Jackson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jackson at 14.2%, compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- In Jackson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.