Demographics details for Live oak, FL vs Independence, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Live oak, FL vs Independence, MO.
Data | Live oak | Independence |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,034 | 121,202 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $43,664 | $57,415 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Live oak vs Independence
- The population in Independence is higher at 121,202, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- The median age in Independence is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 37.5 years in Live oak.
- Independence has a higher median income of $57,415, compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- In Independence, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Independence.
- Independence has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.2% in Live oak.
Demographics
Demographics Live oak vs Independence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Live oak | Independence |
---|---|---|
Black | 38 | 11 |
White | 41 | 71 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 9 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Live oak vs Independence
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Live oak at 38% compared to 11% in Independence.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Independence at 71% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- In Independence, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Live oak.
- Independence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 9% in Live oak.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Live oak at 12% compared to 7% in Independence.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Live oak and Independence at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Live oak | Independence |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 12.9% |
Depression | 19.3% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 22.3% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 20.2% |
Obesity | 37.1% | 38.1% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Live oak vs Independence
- In Independence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Independence at 24.2% versus 19.3% in Live oak.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Live oak at 22.3% compared to 20.8% in Independence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Independence at 20.2% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Independence has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 37.1% in Live oak.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Independence at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Live oak | Independence |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (147) | 0.8% (1,000) |
High School Diploma | 25.0% (1,755) | 22.5% (27,271) |
Less than High School | 11.3% (796) | 13.3% (16,096) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (545) | 13.6% (16,518) |
Education Levels Comparison: Live oak vs Independence
- A higher percentage of residents in Live oak have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Independence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Live oak hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 22.5% in Independence.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Independence at 13.3%, compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- In Independence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.