Demographics details for Live oak, FL vs Christmas valley, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Live oak, FL vs Christmas valley, OR.

Data Live oak Christmas valley
Population 7,034 1,313
Median Age 37.5 years 47.0 years
Median Income $43,664 $46,900
Married Families 31.0% 64.0%
Poverty Level 16% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 6.5

Population Comparison: Live oak vs Christmas valley

  • In Live oak, the population is higher at 7,034, compared to 1,313 in Christmas valley.
  • The median age in Christmas valley is higher at 47.0 years, compared to 37.5 years in Live oak.
  • Christmas valley has a higher median income of $46,900, compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
  • In Christmas valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 64.0%, compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
  • Live oak has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Christmas valley.
  • Christmas valley has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.2% in Live oak.

Demographics

Demographics Live oak vs Christmas valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Live oak Christmas valley
Black 38 1
White 41 94
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 9 2
Two or More Races 12 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Live oak vs Christmas valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Live oak at 38% compared to 1% in Christmas valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Christmas valley at 94% compared to 41% in Live oak.
  • In Christmas valley, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Live oak.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Live oak at 9% compared to 2% in Christmas valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Live oak at 12% compared to 2% in Christmas valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Live oak and Christmas valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Live oak Christmas valley
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.4% Data is updating%
Depression 19.3% Data is updating%
Smoking 22.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.9% Data is updating%
Obesity 37.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 12.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Live oak vs Christmas valley

  • More residents in Live oak report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Live oak at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Live oak at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Live oak at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Live oak at 37.1% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Live oak at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Live oak Christmas valley
No Schooling 2.1% (147) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 25.0% (1,755) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 11.3% (796) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.7% (545) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Live oak vs Christmas valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Live oak have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Live oak hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • More residents in Live oak have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Live oak hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.