Demographics details for Little suamico, WI vs Picayune, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Little suamico, WI vs Picayune, MS.

Data Little suamico Picayune
Population 4,878 11,826
Median Age 41.0 years 38.3 years
Median Income $74,800 $35,649
Married Families 56.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 5% 21%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Little suamico vs Picayune

  • The population in Picayune is higher at 11,826, compared to 4,878 in Little suamico.
  • Residents in Little suamico have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
  • Little suamico has a higher median income of $74,800 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Little suamico at 56.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
  • The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 5% in Little suamico.
  • Picayune has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Little suamico.

Demographics

Demographics Little suamico vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Little suamico Picayune
Black 1 38
White 95 55
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 2
Two or More Races 1 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Little suamico vs Picayune

  • In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • Little suamico has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 55% in Picayune.
  • The Asian population is larger in Little suamico at 1% compared to 0% in Picayune.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Little suamico and Picayune at 2%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Picayune at 5%, compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Little suamico and Picayune at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Little suamico Picayune
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.3%
Depression Data is updating% 24.0%
Smoking Data is updating% 23.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 13.3%
Obesity Data is updating% 44.0%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Little suamico vs Picayune

  • In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Picayune at 24.0% versus 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Picayune at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Little suamico Picayune
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (73)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.8% (2,108)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.8% (1,392)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.1% (1,200)

Education Levels Comparison: Little suamico vs Picayune

  • In Picayune, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • In Picayune, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Picayune at 11.8%, compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • In Picayune, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.